Gateway Β· Async video interviews

Zero-meeting interviews.

Interview 20 candidates in the time one live interview takes. The hiring manager records questions once, candidates answer on their phone, and the panel reviews, votes and decides on their own time. Built into Gateway, no separate tool.

A hiring manager recording interview questions once
πŸ”’ gateway.continuity1.com
G Gateway
Acme Labs β–Ύ
Home Roles Inbox Vetting Meetings Assess Interview Bases Scout
β—Ž 4,310 SR
Senior Product Designer Active
Panel JD RK +
Zero Meeting Interviews +
Senior Product Designer
Active πŸ‘₯ 4 Β· panel of 2
Frontend Engineer
Active πŸ‘₯ 2 Β· panel of 3
Sales Manager
πŸ‘₯ 1 Β· closing this week
Interviews Candidates
+ Invite
COMPLETED (3)
SC
Sarah Chen
3 answers
Selected
MJ
Marcus Johnson
3 answers
PP
Priya Patel
3 answers Β· 1 follow-up out
IN PROGRESS (1)
AK
Alex Kim
Started 2d ago
SC
Sarah Chen Completed
James Selected Rahul Pending ∧ 2 ∨ 0
10:30 AM
Mar 24
β–Ά
β–Ά
Q1 Panel You
Walk me through a project where you had to balance competing stakeholder priorities.
Sarah Chen answered Β· Mar 24, 10:31 AM
In my previous role at a fintech startup, I led the redesign of our onboarding flow. Marketing wanted a shorter funnel, while compliance needed additional verification steps. I mapped both requirements and proposed a progressive disclosure approach…
✦ Quality: 92   Coverage: 88
Strong systems thinking. Clearly articulated the trade-offs and demonstrated a structured approach to stakeholder management. Showed measurable outcomes.
β–Ά Suggested follow-ups (2)
10:45 AM
Mar 24
Internal James Davis β€” Really strong answer. Let's dig into the compliance pushback, that's relevant for our regulatory work.
10:52 AM
Mar 24
β–Ά
β–Ά
Q2 Follow-up James
Tell me about a time you made a design decision with incomplete data.
Sarah Chen answered Β· Mar 24, 10:56 AM
We were launching a new feature with no existing user research. I set up a rapid prototype and ran five guerrilla tests in two days. The data was imperfect but gave us enough signal to commit to a direction…
✦ Quality: 85   Coverage: 79
Good practical example. Didn't fully address how she validated the decision after launch or what she'd do differently.
β–Ά Suggested follow-ups (1)
12:00 AM
Mar 25
πŸ”” Reminder sent to Rahul β€” 1 answer waiting for review
Add an internal note…
Send
πŸ’¬ Ask a Question
Select Reject

One thread per candidate: video answers, AI quality and coverage scores, written analysis, suggested follow-ups, panel votes and internal notes.

How it works

Four steps. No scheduling.

  1. 01

    Record your questions

    Candidates see you, hear you. It feels like a real conversation, and you never repeat yourself.

  2. 02

    Candidates answer on their phone

    One take, recording starts when the question appears. You see the real person, not a rehearsed performance.

  3. 03

    AI does the heavy lifting

    Every answer transcribed, scored and analysed, with follow-ups suggested automatically.

  4. 04

    Your team reviews on their own time

    Panel votes, internal chat, digest emails. One thread from application to hire.

What you get

One thread, not four rounds.

What used to take weeks of scheduling now takes days. Everything happens in one continuous conversation.

HM asks questions once

Record once, send to every candidate. No repeating yourself round after round.

AI scores every answer

Transcription, quality, coverage and analysis, before you review a single response.

Panel reviews async

Everyone votes, comments and shares notes. No scheduling a debrief.

Follow-ups go deeper

Need more? Send async follow-ups to any candidate. No hunting for 30 minutes on a calendar.

HM decides with full context

Everyone’s input is visible. One decision, one thread, full context.

Harder to game than live

One take, question-reveal recording, no notes, no second screen. Coaching gets harder, not easier.

Candidate experience

Candidates actually want to do this.

Async does not have to feel like a form. Candidates see your face, answer in minutes, and get to ask questions of their own.

A candidate recording an interview answer on their phone

10 minutes, not 60

Watch the question, record the answer, done. Fits around their life, not yours.

Mobile-first

No laptop needed. They record from their phone, wherever they are.

They see you, not a chatbot

Your video questions make it a conversation, not a questionnaire.

They can ask questions back

About the role, the team, the culture. Two-way, not an audition.

Your team

Everyone knows what to do. No one has to chase.

Each role sees exactly what it needs, and the process moves without anyone herding calendars.

Hiring managers

Review scored candidates in minutes. Send follow-ups to dig deeper. Decide with the panel’s input visible.

Panel members

Review, follow up and vote. No meetings, no debriefs, no calendar invites.

TA teams

Full pipeline visibility without chasing anyone for feedback.

AI built into every step

You review. AI does the rest.

The AI layer works before you do, so review time is spent judging candidates, not processing them.

Transcription

Read candidates instead of watching them, at your own speed.

Analysis

Quality, coverage and a written breakdown per answer.

Likeness scoring

See how closely each response matches what you are looking for.

Suggestions

Follow-up questions generated for you, ready to send.

Sourcing and screening

Get candidates into the pipeline, not just through it.

Interviews start before the first question: applications and screening are built into the same pipeline, so sourcing lands directly in the system.

Shareable application links

One link per role. Share it on job boards, LinkedIn or your careers page. Candidates apply straight into your pipeline.

Screening questions

Filter applicants with custom screening questions before they reach your interview queue.

Invite decisions before you interview

See application data and screening answers side by side, and decide who is worth interviewing before sending a single invite.

Compare

Everything you get from a live interview. Plus 17 things you don’t.

The comparison this is built around: face-to-face, video calls, and Gateway interviews.

Face-to-faceVirtualGateway
The interview experience
See their face, body language, and toneβœ“βœ“βœ“
Feels like a real conversationβœ“βœ“βœ“
Your panel can evaluate candidatesβœ“βœ“βœ“
Ask follow-up questions to dig deeperβœ“βœ“βœ“
Candidates can ask questions backβœ“βœ“βœ“
Time and scheduling
Zero schedulingβœ•βœ•βœ“
2-minute review instead of 60-minute interviewβœ•βœ•βœ“
One thread replaces L1/L2/L3 roundsβœ•βœ•βœ“
AI layer
Every answer scored for quality and coverageβœ•βœ•βœ“
Written AI analysis per answerβœ•βœ•βœ“
Follow-up questions suggested automaticallyβœ•βœ•βœ“
Full transcription, read instead of watchβœ•βœ•βœ“
Team and process
Everyone votes, hiring manager decidesβœ•βœ•βœ“
Panel reviews without a meetingβœ•βœ•βœ“
Interviewer quality visible and coachableβœ•βœ•βœ“
TA has full visibility without chasingβœ•βœ•βœ“
Internal chat keeps everyone alignedβœ•βœ•βœ“
Digest emails for people who don’t log inβœ•βœ•βœ“
Pre-set reusable question bankβœ•βœ•βœ“
Application and screening built inβœ•βœ•βœ“
Candidate experience and integrity
Candidates do it from their phone in 10 minutesβœ•βœ•βœ“
One take, no notes, no second screenβœ•βœ•βœ“

The best way to interview.

Sign up free and run a full interview round without a single meeting.

Sign up free